BG Soapbox
Virtual Speakers' Corner: Bowling Green, KY
Virtual Speakers' Corner: Bowling Green, KY
By PresentMoment
Thu Nov 05, 2009 08:06:04 PM EST
As reported at Politico:
Rep. Alan Grayson (D-Fla.) recently read off the number of people that he calculates will die as a result of lacking health insurance — in each district represented by a GOP member of Congress who opposes health care reform.
His approach: Name the district, then name of the Republican, then enumerate the number of people who will die without health insurance based on a Harvard analysis — suggesting that the members were responsible for the body count.
In this video segment he rattles off the numbers of estimated dead in Kentucky districts:
To summarize:
KY-01 Ed Whitfield: 113 will die each year
KY-02 Brett Guthrie: 102 will die each year
KY-04 Geoff Davis: 83 will die each year
KY-05 Hal Rodgers 130 will die each year
The methodology that Grayson has used to come up with these numbers is nicely documented in this Daily Kos diary and a transcript of his intro follows:
Grayson: Mr. Speaker, during the civil war Abraham Lincoln our President often pardoned people who have been convicted of treason. You may wonder why he did that. The answer is because he saw death all around him in the civil war and he wanted to make sure he did nothing to add to it. So he pardoned people who have been found guilty of the most grievous crime one can commit in this country. Simply because he loved life. In the same way I’d like to think whether I leave here after 2 years or 20 years that there will be no blood on my hands. That’s why I am against the war in Iraq. That’s why I’m against the war in in Afghanistan. And that’s why I’m so much in favor of health care reform that saves lives in America. We had a different kind of President for 8 years recently. And we had a different kind of administration. An administration that was willing to bear any degree of suffering and pain as long as it was somebody else. If you were homeless it was your fault, if you jobless it was your fault. And if you died because you had no health insurance. That was your fault. Now that administration is out of power. We the American people have removed them because they abused it. But they have left behind in the House and Senate people that feel much the way they do. Recently a Harvard study published in a peer-reviewed journal, the American Journal of Public Health, announced that 44,789 American die every single year because they have no health insruanc.e In American today if you find two people who are physically identical. Same race, same age, same gender, same smoking habits, same weight. If you find two people who are physically identical and one of them has insurance and the other one does not. Then the one without insurance, that American that has the misfortune simply not to have health coverage. That American is 40% more likely to die. This bill that we are considering now to reform health care in America would end that. It covers 96% of all Americans. It ends this grievous national tragedy where day after day, week after week, month after month, 122 of us die every single day because they have no health insurance. Now I’m sure that if we learned that al quida was going to launch an attack on the United States and kill 44,789 Americans at any time next year. I’m sure that we would do anything in our power to prevent that. I submit to you that we should do the same about this. We should do exactly the same here because we face the same threat. It’s a less visible threat. It’s gone on for generations. But it’s a threat nevertheless. If you don’t let people see the doctor then a certain number of them are going to do. And to bring to this point home in face of united opposition by that side of the aisle, what we have done is something very simple. The Urban Institute has published the number of uninsured people in each congressional district in this country. The American Journal of Public Health have told us what percentageof those uninsured people will die next year simply people they don’t have health insurance. So what we’ve don’t is very simple. We’ve taken one number and the other number and through the magic of multiplication we know how many of those people will die. And I think it’s time we called attention to that. So what we’ve done for each with Republican member since they are united in opposition to this bill and apparently proud of it. For each Republican member we have identified in each district the number of dead. They are as follows.
Will this have any impact whatsoever on Brett Guthrie? Would it matter to him if one of the estimated 102 people who die this year due in small part to his actions was his neighbor? If I were in his shoes, I’d think twice about voting against a bill that could save this many lives in his district each year. Besides, what’s more important than human life?
Contact Congressman Guthrie and ask him to support the Democratic Health Care Reform Bill
Phone: 202-225-3501
Web: http://guthrie.house.gov
By PresentMoment
Wed Nov 04, 2009 06:46:16 PM EST
Filing for local and state-wide public offices has started in earnest this week. Local Republicans gathered on the downtown square Tuesday night to decry the proposed government-run public option for health care. Steve Wilson, candidate for the 32nd District Senate seat currently held by Democrat Mike Reynolds, had this to say in Daily News article:
“It’s important to promote a Republican for the state Senate because it’s the only thing that’s stopping what’s happening in Washington from happening here,” Wilson said. “We can’t spend our way into prosperity.”
What’s happening in Washington is what should be happening all over the country. Providing health-care for those millions without it is a good thing and Republicans like Wilson don’t seem to get that. They’d prefer the status quo which keeps the insurance companies fat and happy. It curious that Republicans are all for competition in principle but not in practice.
By PresentMoment
Tue Oct 27, 2009 07:46:16 PM EDT
Well the fight over salary increases for WKU Athletic Director Wood Selig and Dean Kahler is heating up in the local media. First on Friday October 23, 2009 a story in the Bowling Green Daily News entitled Faculty looking to apply pressure contains a few tidbits from President Ransdell:
“Everyone across our campus contributes to the success we have enjoyed in (admissions, advisement, retention and graduate rates), and everyone benefits from that success,” Ransdell wrote. “Someone, however, has to be accountable and feel the pressure to ensure sustained performance. It is a ‘what have you done lately’ kind of job.”
Sounds like he’s describing his own job. Lucky for him that he’s got a 30 year contract which makes him President for life.
“It took many Sun Belt Conference and national variables into consideration and is on the low end of most I-A comparables,” Ransdell wrote. “Few athletic programs are performing as well as ours and few are as financially stable as ours. Much of the new contract is in incentives funded by athletic success – which, if he collects them, means that we continue to be successful and financially balanced.”
So he’s already highly incentivized to perform well in his position regardless of the economic health of the university. Why would a 24% base salary increase be necessary? He does well in his job, he is paid more, everybody wins. I’m sure the rank-and-file at WKU would love to be equally incentivized.
Next comes a story from the Daily News Sports Page
In a nutshell, regents will discuss proposals to award a pair of WKU administrators meaty raises. One of them is athletic director Wood Selig, who is poised to collect an annual boost of $34,000 – making his base salary $175,000 – along with a healthy retirement contribution and enough team-performance incentives and bonuses to fill all those empty seats at Houchens-Smith Stadium.
Given the poor attendance this year for the 1-A Football team maybe Selig should divert his $34K to paying people to attend the games. Maybe then they’ll meet the NCAA 1-A rule for minimum attendance of 15,000 per game.
Average at least 15,000 in actual or paid attendance for all home football contests over a
rolling two-year period. [Bylaw 20.9.7.3]
I guess one option would be to increase the size of the Marching Band to 14,000 since band members count towards the 15K threshold. That’s a lot of drumming…
By PresentMoment
Thu Oct 22, 2009 08:05:28 PM EDT
This is your virtual Speaker’s Corner for discussing local progressive political and community interest topics in Bowling Green and Warren County, Kentucky. Please register and add your voice through comments to Posts or create you own Posts today.
We expect this to be an informative and fact-based site and won’t cater to conspiracy theories, hateful speech, foul language, or personal attacks of any kind.